Attitudes To Language IELTS Reading Answers with Explanation

Luyện tập đề IELTS Reading Practice với passage Attitudes To Language được lấy từ cuốn sách IELTS Cambridge IELTS Practice Test 9 - Test 3 - Passage 1 với trải nghiệm thi IELTS trên máy và giải thích đáp án chi tiết bằng Linearthinking, kèm list từ vựng IELTS cần học trong bài đọc.

Làm Bài Xem giải thích Từ vựng

Attitudes To Language IELTS Reading Answers with Explanation

📖 Bài đọc (reading passage)

Attitudes to language
It is not easy to be systematic and objective about language study. Popular linguistic debate regularly deteriorates into invective and polemic. Language belongs to everyone, so most people feel they have a right to hold an opinion about it. And when opinions differ, emotions can run high. Arguments can start as easily over minor points of usage as over major policies of linguistic education.  

Language, moreover, is a very public behaviour, so it is easy for different usages to be noted and criticised. No part of society or social behaviour is exempt: linguistic factors influence how we judge personality, intelligence, social status, educational standards, job aptitude, and many other areas of identity and social survival. As a result, it is easy to hurt, and to be hurt, when language use is unfeelingly attacked. 

In its most general sense, prescriptivism is the view that one variety of language has an inherently higher value than others, and that this ought to be imposed on the whole of the speech community. The view is propounded especially in relation to grammar and vocabulary, and frequently with reference to pronunciation. The variety which is favoured, in this account, is usually a version of the 'standard' written language, especially as encountered in literature, or in the formal spoken language which most closely reflects this style. Adherents to this variety are said to speak or write 'correctly'; deviations from it are said to be 'incorrect! 

All the main languages have been studied prescriptively, especially in the 18th century approach to the writing of grammars and dictionaries. The aims of these early grammarians were threefold: (a) they wanted to codify the principles of their languages, to show that there was a system beneath the apparent chaos of usage, (b) they wanted a means of settling disputes over usage, and (c) they wanted to point out what they felt to be common errors, in order to 'improve' the language. The authoritarian nature of the approach is best characterised by its reliance on ‘rules' of grammar. Some usages are 'prescribed,' to be learnt and followed accurately; others are 'proscribed,' to be avoided. In this early period, there were no half-measures: usage was either right or wrong, and it was the task of the grammarian not simply to record alternatives, but to pronounce judgement upon them. 

These attitudes are still with us, and they motivate a widespread concern that linguistic standards should be maintained. Nevertheless, there is an alternative point of view that is concerned less with standards than with the facts of linguistic usage. This approach is summarised in the statement that it is the task of the grammarian to describe, not prescribe to record the facts of linguistic diversity, and not to attempt the impossible tasks of evaluating language variation or halting language change. In the second half of the 18th century, we already find advocates of this view, such as Joseph Priestiey, whose Rudiments of English Grammar (1761) insists that 'the custom of speaking is the original and only just standard of any language! Linguistic issues, it is argued, cannot be solved by logic and legislation. And this view has become the tenet of the modern linguistic approach to grammatical analysis. 

In our own time, the opposition between 'descriptivists' and 'prescriptivists' has often become extreme, with both sides painting unreal pictures of the other. Descriptive grammarians have been presented as people who do not care about standards, because of the way they see all forms of usage as equally valid. Prescriptive grammarians have been presented as blind adherents to a historical tradition. The opposition has even been presented in quasi-political terms - of radical liberalism vs elitist conservatism.

❓ Câu hỏi (questions)

There are understandable reasons why arguments occur about language.

People feel more strongly about language education than about small differences in language usage.

Our assessment of a person’s intelligence is affected by the way he or she uses language.

Prescriptive grammar books cost a lot of money to buy in the 18th century.

Prescriptivism still exists today.

According to descriptivists it is pointless to try to stop language change.

Descriptivism only appeared after the 18th century.

Both descriptivists and prescriptivists have been misrepresented.

The language debate

According to 9
﻿, there is only one correct form of language. Linguists who take this approach to language place great importance on grammatical 10
﻿. Conversely, the view of 11
﻿, such as Joseph Priestley, is that grammar should be based on 12
﻿﻿

descriptivists

language experts

popular speech

formal language

evaluation

rules

modern linguists

prescriptivists

change

What is the writer’s purpose in Reading Passage 1?

to argue in favour of a particular approach to writing dictionaries and grammar books

to present a historical account of differing views of language

to describe the differences between spoken and written language

to show how a certain view of language has been discredited

🔥 Answer key (đáp án và giải thích)

Yes

Giải thích chi tiết

Áp dụng DOL's Linearthinking ﻿﻿
﻿ 1    It   is   not easy   to be   systematic   and   objective   about   language study  
﻿ 2    Popular linguistic debate...  
﻿ 3    Language   belongs to   everyone   so   most people   feel   they   have   a right   to hold   an opinion   about   it ﻿
  4    When   opinions...  

Xem full giải thích

IELTS Reading Practice

Gồm làm đề, xem giải thích chi tiết, học từ vựng của những bài thi IELTS Reading phổ biến nhất trên thị trường

Living With Artificial Intelligence IELTS Reading Answers with Explanation

Luyện tập đề IELTS Reading Practice với passage Living With Artificial Intelligence được lấy từ cuốn sách IELTS Cambridge IELTS Practice Test 18 - Test 2 - Passage 2 với trải nghiệm thi IELTS trên máy và giải thích đáp án chi tiết bằng Linearthinking, kèm list từ vựng IELTS cần học trong bài đọc.

Computer Games For Preschoolers Nintendo's Research And Design Process IELTS Reading Answers with Explanation

Luyện tập đề IELTS Reading Practice với passage Computer Games For Preschoolers Nintendo's Research And Design Process được lấy từ cuốn sách IELTS Actual Test 4 - Test 6 - Passage 1 với trải nghiệm thi IELTS trên máy và giải thích đáp án chi tiết bằng Linearthinking, kèm list từ vựng IELTS cần học trong bài đọc.

The Development Of The London Underground Railway IELTS Reading Answers with Explanation

Luyện tập đề IELTS Reading Practice với passage The Development Of The London Underground Railway được lấy từ cuốn sách IELTS Cambridge IELTS Practice Test 17 - Test 1 - Passage 1 với trải nghiệm thi IELTS trên máy và giải thích đáp án chi tiết bằng Linearthinking, kèm list từ vựng IELTS cần học trong bài đọc.

The Thylacine IELTS Reading Answers with Explanation

Luyện tập đề IELTS Reading Practice với passage The Thylacine được lấy từ cuốn sách IELTS Cambridge IELTS Practice Test 17 - Test 3 - Passage 1 với trải nghiệm thi IELTS trên máy và giải thích đáp án chi tiết bằng Linearthinking, kèm list từ vựng IELTS cần học trong bài đọc.

Alfred Wegener: Science, Exploration And The Theory Of Continental Drift IELTS Reading Answers with Explanation

Luyện tập đề IELTS Reading Practice với passage Alfred Wegener: Science, Exploration And The Theory Of Continental Drift được lấy từ cuốn sách IELTS Cambridge IELTS Practice Test 18 - Test 4 - Passage 3 với trải nghiệm thi IELTS trên máy và giải thích đáp án chi tiết bằng Linearthinking, kèm list từ vựng IELTS cần học trong bài đọc.